Home
Home | Stories | Features | Local | Network News

© 2009 EarthSmiles.net . All rights reserved.
Made from 100% recycled pixels.
Facebook
Is Google the carbon bigfoot in the IT game
Green giant or Environmental hazard?
By Arjun Raj

A common question that is playing on the minds of some environmentalists is whether Google is doing more harm than good to the planet. US (Harvard University) physicist, Alex Wissner-Gross’s research claims that a single Google search from a desktop produces 7g of CO2, as reported in The Times, London, and "Performing two Google searches from a desktop computer can generate about the same amount of carbon dioxide as boiling a kettle for a cup of tea…"

Google replied saying, “In fact, in the time it takes to do a Google search, your own personal computer will use more energy than Google uses to answer your query.” The IT giant says that the average car, when driven for a kilometer (0.6 miles), generates as many greenhouse gasses as 1000 Google searches. Kevin Marks, a worker at Google in their Open Social project says on his blog that the average human being produces about 0.6g of CO2 by just breathing for ten minutes. “A single book runs around 2,500 grams of CO2, or more than 350 times a Google search,” says Jason Kincaid of TechCrunch. He continues, “A single cheeseburger has a carbon footprint of around 3,600 grams - over 500 times larger than a Google search. Granted, meat in general has a notoriously large carbon footprint, but if you're genuinely concerned about your environmental impact, then try cutting a burger from your diet every week and search guilt-free. (You may even lose a few pounds!)”

In his book “Ten Technologies to Save the Planet”, author Chris Goodall says that each Google search produces about 7g – 10g of carbon during an assumed period of 15 minutes per search. (In another estimate, from carbonfootprint.com the CO2 emissions of a Google search are put at between 1g and 10g) The question that comes to mind however, is whether these carbon emissions are from Google searches, or from the general use of the computer itself. True, in order to speedily serve up results, Google has a huge redundant capacity of data centres about the world, and this overlap does increase its carbon footprint, since the cheapest and most easily available energy source is coal.

However, despite the fact that a Google search produces about half the amount of carbon, as a boiling kettle, the environmental concern remains due to the fact that Google handles about 200 million searches on a daily basis, environmental articles are unflatteringly calling the global IT industry ‘carbon criminals’. Journalist and writer John Naughton feels that “environmental impact of computing is one of the Next Big Stories”.

Bookmark and Share

Follow us
Twitter
.More Features
Larissa Brown's Eco Power
A young Australian leads the world with a solid investment in a green future.GO!

The Truth about Onions and
Potatoes
How healthy are your vegetables? Often, not very, if you buy from your local market. GO!

The Green Life!
India is fast becoming the choice destination for adventures with nature. GO!

Who resurrected the electric car?
If GM was its killer, then Telsa Motors certainly deserves to be called resurrector.GO!

.Feedback!

Something to say on this story? Tell us here!






Computing does have an environmental impact, and it’s not necessarily your Google searches! According to an article on the web, online virtual reality games such as Second Life consume 1,752 kilowatt hours of electricity per year - about as much used by the average Brazilian!
Further, microblogging sites, Twitter, for example, may also contribute to this wastefulness – consider the utterly inane and unimportant details people pour through these networks, every second -“Just twiddled my toes! How do you like that!!?” Of course, your computer can save energy, too. If you make an online transaction instead of visiting your bank, you save the fuel taken to get there, and the extra energy to cool you at the branch *and* the branch using its computers to facilitate your transaction! So, it really depends on the sort of activity undertaken. Further, Wissner-Gross, says he never mentions Google in his study. "For some reason, in their story on the study, The Times had an axe to grind with Google," Wissner-Gross was quoted on TechNewsWorld. "Our work has nothing to do with Google. Our focus was exclusively on the Web overall, and we found that it takes on average about 20 milligrams of CO2 per second to visit a Web site."

And the example involving tea kettles? "They did that. I have no idea where they got those statistics," Wissner-Gross said.

- Farrell Shah